What’s in a jar of NutellaReddit/MrFlow
By Jess Murray Truth Theory

A viral image has revealed that palm oil is one of the major ingredients in jars of Nutella, amongst excessive amounts of sugar.

The image displaying the true ingredients of the well-known, and globally adored, chocolate spread quickly went viral after its contents were revealed that many people did not expect. Different from the usual list of ingredients on the back of the jar that is commonly overlooked, this diagram shows layers of the brand’s five main ingredients in their raw form. These are palm oil, cocoa, hazelnuts, skimmed milk powder and sugar.

According to reports, the size of the labelled section in the diagram is said to represent the real proportion in the jar, which many were shocked to see was 50% white sugar. This image was released earlier this week following reports that Nutella may be taken out of supermarkets due to its “cancer-causing properties”. This came after a report, conducted by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), claimed that palm oil was more carcinogenic than any other oil. However, since the reports, Nutella has denied the claims that the hazelnut chocolate spread carries cancer risks, stating that the palm oil that they use in every jar is high quality and safe to eat.

Whilst Nutella would not confirm or deny if the image is accurate, due to claims that the recipe is top secret, the nutritional information on each jar, as well as the website, reveals that there is 8.5g of sugar in every tablespoon of the spread, which means that every 400g jar contains a huge quantity of 227.2g of sugar. This vast amount works out to be more than half the jar’s weight.

Another major ingredient that has caught many people’s attention is the use of palm oil. Whilst palm oil is the cheapest oil on the market, the use of it is highly controversial, as it has major links with deforestation of major rainforests, as well as wiping out huge wildlife populations. Although palm oil is used in a huge array of common products, from cosmetics to food, the excessive consumption of the oil has had a major negative effect on the natural world. Palm oil plantations currently cover over 27 million hectares of the Earth’s surface. This has resulted in a huge loss of forests and human settlements, as these areas are completely destroyed to make room for the oil plantations, which have since been referred to as “green deserts”.

Despite this, Nutella relies on the use of palm oil to create the distinctive smooth texture, as well as prolonging the product’s shelf life. Nutella, which is made by Ferrero, insists that the product would not be the same without the use of palm oil, and a switch to alternative ingredients could cost the company an additional $8-22 million a year.

After the image went viral Nutella said in a statement, “We don’t disclose the full proportions of the ingredients in Nutella as our recipe is unique and we wish to safeguard this. The product’s label provides simple and clear nutritional information per 15g portion, or two heaped teaspoons, as well as per 100g. The ingredients are also listed on the Nutella website.”

Ferrero, who manufacture Nutella, added, “One of Ferrero’s core nutritional beliefs is that small portion sizes help people to enjoy their favourite foods in moderation. The labelling on our products enables consumers to make informed choices and helps ensure that Nutella can be enjoyed as part of a balanced diet.”

In response to the recent cancer scare from Nutella products, they said, “The health and safety of consumers is an absolute and first priority for Ferrero and we confirm that Ferrero products are safe. The EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) has analysed the presence of contaminants in a large number of products and oils stating that the presence of contaminants depends on the oils and fats used as well as the processes they are subjected to.”

“It is for this reason that Ferrero carefully selects quality raw materials and applies specific industrial processes that limit their presence to minimum levels, fully in line with the parameters defined by the EFSA. In addition, our quality teams constantly monitor such factors and guarantee the food safety of our products to the consumer.”


The original article can be found at Truth Theory.

Woolworths the fresh food people

Woolworths moves into racketeering.
With Covid 19 wreaking havoc on our way of life there are various companies doing their best to take advantage of the situation, such as petrol stations charging up to $0.40 cents a litre more than anyone else for for fuel. But this is to be expected as they have a history of of ripping the public off and the authorities doing nothing about it. Also grocery companies charging $14.00 for one cauliflower.

However what is not expected is Woolworths deciding to gouge the disabled and elderly that have carers that assist with their shopping. Woolworths had shopping online where you could order online and choose a pick up time and the carer could just drop in and pick the items up. Seems very simple, a person doesn’t have to spend time wandering around the store with whatever health condition they have, instead an employee who is there for their shift does the work of collecting the items for the order and then you or your carer can drop in spend a couple of minutes picking the order and no matter what their health condition is they are not likely to be spreading anything.

Instead Woolworths have decided to delve into the realms of racketeering by removing this service and providing only a paid delivery service. So still their staff putting the orders together but adding the additional staff of a delivery driver for which you have to pay an exorbitant fee for the delivery and have someone available for a two hour window to receive it.

This might be fine for the average person but for the disabled or elderly that has a paid carer service this is untenable as you can’t have a carer just hanging around for two hours whilst Woolworths are just padding their bottom line with the delivery fee they impose.

Woolworths need to reverse this decision immediately otherwise the effect on the the disabled and elderly will be felt for the entire period of the Woolworths Covid 19 racketeering period.

Woolworths were approached for a comment and advised that the safety of their workers comes first.
How can the safety of workers be more at risk by packing groceries for fulfilling groceries orders for pick up then fulfilling orders for delivery. Which then require another team member to deliver them?
This is clearly a case of Woolworths wanting to pad their bottom line buy forcing the disabled and elderly to pay more to have their groceries delivered.
Woolworths must address this immediately as to continue to gouge the disabled and elderly is totally unacceptable.